Shilpa Shetty News: Some things are part of a journalist’s behaviour, Shilpa Shetty’s lawyer told the court. I am unable to remark on journalistic standards. These journalists do not obey the rules.
Shilpa Shetty Defamation case: Shilpa Shetty, who had filed a defamation action in the Raj Kundra pornographic case, had her plea examined by the Bombay High Court on Friday. Shilpa cried throughout this, and her lawyer stated that journalists do not question her side of the story, which is sad. Shilpa cried throughout this time.
Some things are part of a journalist’s behaviour, Shilpa Shetty’s lawyer informed the court. I am unable to remark on journalistic standards. These journalists do not conform to the rules.
The creator of a private YouTube channel and a lawyer informed the court that the video had been withdrawn and that he would not post it again. The court stated in the judgement that the case against Raj Kundra is not a subject of concern to them. The defender has already stated that he has erased the footage and would not retake it, citing a post by an online journalist. will be uploaded.
The court mentioned Defendant, which is a YouTube channel. The Defendant makes a remark on Shilpa Shetty‘s moral standing. This video, I’ve been told, has been taken off. It should not be used again.
In addition, the court stated that it is closely connected to Raj Kundra‘s current inquiry, referring to a Bollywood portal. Shilpa is accused of deleting evidence, according to the article. This article looks to be true on the surface and was derived from the investigating agency’s understanding.
The information is based on police observation, not on Shilpa’s innocence or guilt. The majority of the defenders, with the exception of those who have been requested to delete their articles, will have to reply.
Shilpa’s right to privacy must be maintained, the court held. Shilpa’s children and their upbringing are off the table in this situation. No portion of this should be interpreted as a media publication ban. Although the Court is not making such an order, it should not be interpreted as a grant of interim or ad interim relief.
The court stated that if one is a public figure does not mean they do not have the right to privacy. The next hearing date in this matter has been set for September 20.